Fifty-three years ago, President Lyndon Johnson declared a “war on poverty.” President Richard Nixon declared a “war on drugs” 46 years ago. The last I checked, we haven’t won either of them. We’re not going to win the “war on terrorism” either.
We like the idea of fighting wars because we think we can win a clear victory. And in our long history of wars against other nations, we’ve defeated many of them. But we can’t win a war against a complex phenomenon like poverty, drug use, or terrorism. We can fight terrorists, but every day we are fighting is a victory for them, and a defeat for us.
Terrorists have two advantages. First, what terrorists want most is attention, and attention is easier than ever to come by. Thanks to 24/7 TV news, social media, and web videos, terrorists get instant wall-to-wall media coverage for their deeds. And they even get credit for copycat attacks.
Second, destruction has been democratized, in the sense that it’s easier than ever for people with little training or expertise to cause vast damage. Nineteenth-century terrorists using pistols could kill one or two people. Terrorists now use bombs, machine guns, chemical weapons, and even airplanes. In the 9/11 attacks, 19 people killed almost 3,000 people in an operation that cost less than $500,000 to pull off.