Haven't signed into your Scholastic account before?
Teachers, not yet a subscriber?
Subscribers receive access to the website and print magazine.
You are being redirecting to Scholastic's authentication page...
Announcements & Tutorials
Explore Primary Sources
How Students and Families Can Log In
1 min.
Setting Up Student View
Sharing Articles with Your Students
2 min.
Interactive Activities
4 min.
Sharing Videos with Students
Using Upfront with Educational Apps
5 min.
Join Our Facebook Group!
Exploring the Archives
Powerful Differentiation Tools
3 min.
World and U.S. Almanac & Atlas
Subscriber Only Resources
Access this article and hundreds more like it with a subscription to The New York TImes Upfront magazine.
Article Options
Presentation View
This River Could Sue You
Maori men paddling on the Whanganui River in New Zealand, 2015
If you’re ever in New Zealand, be careful how you treat the Whanganui River—it has the same legal rights you have. A court recently gave the river the status of a living being, a first for a natural resource. It’s a victory for the indigenous Maori people, who have long considered the Whanganui a living ancestor. Now, if someone abuses the river, the New Zealand law would treat that person as if he or she harmed a human. Other countries have recently taken similar steps without specifying particular resources: Ecuador’s constitution recognized the right of nature to exist in 2008, and Bolivia passed a law in 2011 granting nature equal rights with humans. Environmentalists are applauding the trend as a way to protect nature from pollution and overdevelopment. So does this mean a river or mountain near you could be the next “person”? Experts say it’s a long shot in the U.S., where activists have been unsuccessful in gaining full legal rights for animals. “It would be an even further stretch to confer standing directly on rivers, mountains, and forests,” says Jody Freeman, director of the environmental law program at Harvard Law School in Massachusetts.