The Pyeongchang Games aren’t the first time politics have claimed the Olympics’ spotlight. Athletes have long used the competition to speak out against human rights abuses and other injustices (see “Politics & the Olympics”). Entire countries have even boycotted the Games for political reasons. More than 60 countries, including the U.S., skipped the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow to protest the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan, for example.
But this time, the controversy hits especially close to home. The Games are just 60 miles from the demilitarized zone (DMZ), the heavily guarded boundary that has divided the two Koreas since the end of the Korean War (1950-53). That conflict, in which 34,000 Americans died, ended in a stalemate, with both sides agreeing to a ceasefire. But no peace treaty was signed, and the two countries—along with the U.S.—continue to keep troops stationed along the DMZ, in case the conflict resumes.
Today, South Korea is a thriving democracy with the 13th largest economy in the world. Communist North Korea, meanwhile, is one of the poorest countries on Earth, often facing shortages of food, water, and electricity. Kim pours much of his nation’s meager resources into his military.
The Koreas’ Olympic history has been rocky. When South Korea was selected to host the 1988 Summer Games, North Korea pushed to co-host. It was rejected—and retaliated by blowing up a Korean Air flight before the Games, killing 115 people.
But the countries have also presented a united front at the Olympics. The two nations marched together under a unified Korean flag at three opening ceremonies: in 2000, 2004, and 2006. And in 2016, two gymnasts, one from North Korea and the other from South Korea, snapped a selfie together, showcasing the potential power of the Games to promote peace. Though the public gushed over the photo, the Koreas’ tense relationship didn’t change.