Haven't signed into your Scholastic account before?
Teachers, not yet a subscriber?
Subscribers receive access to the website and print magazine.
You are being redirecting to Scholastic's authentication page...
Announcements & Tutorials
Explore Primary Sources
How Students and Families Can Log In
1 min.
Setting Up Student View
Sharing Articles with Your Students
2 min.
Interactive Activities
4 min.
Sharing Videos with Students
Using Upfront with Educational Apps
5 min.
Join Our Facebook Group!
Exploring the Archives
Powerful Differentiation Tools
3 min.
World and U.S. Almanac & Atlas
Subscriber Only Resources
Access this article and hundreds more like it with a subscription to The New York TImes Upfront magazine.
Article Options
Presentation View
A Tiger in the Supreme Court
jeep2499/Shutterstock.com
Should forest rangers hunt down a man-eating tiger? That question was at the center of a Supreme Court case in India last month. Because tigers are endangered, killing them in India requires special permission. Forest rangers argued that a five-year-old tigress, named T-1, had killed 13 people in central India in the past two years, and they needed to hunt her to protect villagers. But conservationists said T-1 had killed only in self-defense when people ventured into her territory. The Court ruled that the hunt could go on, but the rangers should try their best to capture T-1 and put her in a zoo. After decades of decline, the Indian tiger population is on the rise, thanks to conservation efforts. But clashes with humans are also rising, as more villages expand into the tigers’ habitats. Following the court decision, rangers said they would attempt to ride elephants into the forest to capture her. But forestry official K.M. Abharna knew that wouldn’t be easy. “She’s very clever,” Abharna says.