Some people say that cloning pets can help ease the emotional pain of losing a beloved four-legged friend.
“It satisfies the owner’s spiritual needs and increases happiness,” says Wang Chuduan, a professor at China Agricultural University in Beijing. “There is a market demand. So what’s the problem?”
However, others say it’s both unethical and inhumane. They point out that it takes several pets to produce just one clone.
Here’s how it’s typically done: Scientists remove eggs from a group of female pets and replace the DNA in those eggs with DNA that’s been harvested from the pet being cloned. An electric shock to the eggs triggers fertilization, and the embryos are then surgically implanted into surrogate pet mothers.
Cloning a pet usually takes many tries; some experts estimate that it works only 20 percent of the time. Most often, the surrogate mothers have miscarriages. To clone Garlic, scientists implanted skin cells from Huang’s original cat into eggs harvested from other cats. Forty cloned embryos were implanted into four surrogate mother cats. That produced three pregnancies, two of which resulted in miscarriages, says Chen Benchi, head of Sinogene’s experiments team.
Jessica Pierce, a bioethicist at the University of Colorado Denver, argues that the use of surrogates to produce clones is “similar to the harm that you would impose on a woman whose only purpose in life is to be a breeding machine for man.”
“The cat has no intrinsic value,” she says. “It’s used as an object, as a means to somebody’s end.”