When Candor first found Pakyi and Tamandua in 1989—in a tree, foraging for honey— Brazil effectively sided with the loggers. For the next two decades, the government did nothing, and the forest was carved up by sawmills.
Then, in 2007, Candor found the two men again. The government, under a leftist administration and influenced by shifting attitudes about preserving the Amazon, reversed its stance. Brazil protected nearly 1,000 square miles of forest, an area twice the size of Los Angeles, just for Pakyi and Tamandua.
But the protections infuriated the people who owned that land. Decades earlier, the government had sold most of the territory to settlers for almost nothing, part of an effort to encourage Brazilians to exploit the forest and expand the economy.
The people who inherited or bought those land titles are now challenging the protections to get back to razing the land and putting cattle on it. That fight is led by the Penços, a family that runs the state’s largest limestone mines and owns nearly half the Piripkura protected area. They argue that Pakyi and Tamandua do not need so much land, and the government is violating their rights in a veiled effort to stop logging.
Francisco Penço, the spokesperson for his family, says the men are “being used as a means to further an environmentalist agenda.”
But to Candor, the Piripkura have a stronger claim to the land than the Penços.
“If they have the right to all this,” he says of the Penços, “why don’t the guys who were born here, grew up here, lived here, and saw their relatives die here?”