Haven't signed into your Scholastic account before?
Teachers, not yet a subscriber?
Subscribers receive access to the website and print magazine.
You are being redirecting to Scholastic's authentication page...
Announcements & Tutorials
Explore Primary Sources
How Students and Families Can Log In
1 min.
Setting Up Student View
Sharing Articles with Your Students
2 min.
Interactive Activities
4 min.
Sharing Videos with Students
Using Upfront with Educational Apps
5 min.
Join Our Facebook Group!
Exploring the Archives
Powerful Differentiation Tools
3 min.
World and U.S. Almanac & Atlas
Subscriber Only Resources
Access this article and hundreds more like it with a subscription to The New York TImes Upfront magazine.
Article Options
Presentation View
The Dilemma
Mary Altaffer/AP Images
Used Sweatshop Goods
I shop at clothing resale stores that benefit nonprofit organizations, and occasionally I purchase items made in developing nations. I surmise these garments are from sweatshops that spew pollutants and have workers endure horrendous conditions for barely any pay. In buying them secondhand with the money going to good causes, do I untether myself from the harm that their manufacture entailed? —Diane Pepi
You shouldn’t shun all clothing manufactured in the developing world; textile manufacturing has helped lift huge numbers of people there out of extreme poverty. And buying previously worn apparel does reduce the environmental toll associated with our fast-fashion habits. What will really make a difference, though, are larger reforms—getting more companies to ensure that manufacturers meet decent labor and environmental standards. The more of us who commit to buying apparel only from such companies, the better.
—Adapted from “The Ethicist” in The New York Times Magazine